KKanıtFlowEarly prototype

FOR INDUSTRIAL EXPORT TEAMS

Your next quote.
Every requirement.
Evidence attached.

Review technical RFQs against your product documents. Find conflicts and missing evidence before they become promises in a quotation.

Explore the working demoSee the review process

Starting with pump and valve exporters in Türkiye.

TECHNICAL REVIEW / SAMPLE RFQ
Operating pressure ≥ 16 barConflict
Product datasheet · page 1
“Maximum operating pressure: 10 bar.”
EN 10204 3.1 certificateMissing evidence

A finding is useful when you can check its source.

RFQ requirement ↔ Product evidence

WORKING PROTOTYPE

A review you can inspect.

Change the RFQ conditions and see the evidence matrix update.

Synthetic pump documents. This demo uses explicit comparison rules; it does not call Claude. Document interpretation with Claude is the next development step.
0 Supported0 Conflicts0 Missing0 To review
Requirement review for fictional KF-P100 pump. Select a source to inspect its evidence.
RFQ requirementFindingSource

NEXT CONVERSATION

Clarification questions

    A supported finding describes these sample documents. It is not product certification or an engineering approval. A sales engineer reviews the result before any quote is sent.

    FROM DOCUMENTS TO A REVIEWABLE QUOTE

    Read. Reconcile. Review.

    01

    Bring your evidence

    The planned document workflow accepts a customer specification, approved product datasheets and available certificates.

    02

    Check every requirement

    Claude will extract requirements and relate them to product evidence. Each finding will carry its source and a clear uncertainty status.

    03

    Decide with your engineer

    Review conflicts and missing documents, ask for clarification, and approve the matrix before preparing your offer.

    THE PROJECT

    A focused start.
    A measurable next step.

    KanıtFlow is an early startup project led by Mete Alp Karvan in Türkiye. The first customer hypothesis is small pump and valve exporters handling English-language technical RFQs.

    We are building toward a Claude-powered pilot. There are no announced customers, investments or confirmed hires.

    NOW

    Inspectable prototype

    Rule-based review, linked sample evidence, editable conditions and CSV export.

    NEXT

    Claude integration and expert evaluation

    Evaluate requirement extraction and evidence grounding against a manually labeled document set.

    THEN

    Design-partner pilots

    Measure review time, unsupported conclusions, repeat usage and willingness to pay.